Legal Opinion

Groesbeck v. Groesbeck

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1890No. 6512PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Appeal from Bexar. Tried below before Hon. G. H. Noonan.

1Opinion of the Court

COLLARD, Judge.

—Charles F. Groesbeck, of San Antonio, Texas, and Mollie W. Styles, of Alabama, both temporarily at Aberdeen, Mississippi, both of age, and deaf mutes, on the 6th day of May, 1884, intermarried in Aberdeen, and immediately after the marriage came to San Antonio with P. H. Groesbeck, the mother of Charles, her home, where they lived together until the 2nd of July, 1884, at which time Charles F, Groesbeck died intestate.

Prior to the marriage, and in contemplation thereof, an antenuptial agreement was made between Charles F. and Mollie W., to-wit, on the 29th of April, 1884, at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. White v. ShepperdTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Cox v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Little v. BirdwellTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Bradley v. LoveTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Mayo v. Tudor's HeirsTexas Supreme Court · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Lauraine v. AsheTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Lauraine v. AsheTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Burton v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Weidner v. CrowtherTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Miers v. BettertonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API