Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Recore

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 15, 2003No. 01-0161PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POOLER, Circuit Judge.

In 1978 we held that prison inmates in a temporary release program must receive a hearing prior to revocation of their release status. Tracy v. Salamack, 572 F.2d 393, 395-96 (2d Cir.1978) (per curiam). The district court, whose reasoning we adopted, found that plaintiffs satisfied both prongs of the test that determines whether the Due Process Clause requires a hearing. First, the prisoners demonstrated that they had suffered a grievous loss of liberty within the meaning of Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972). Tracy v. Salamack, 440…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Pabon v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Mckenna v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  3. Velez v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. Rzayeva v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
  5. Reuland v. HynesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API