Oklahoma Industries Authority v. Barnes
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentHodges, Justice
Financing of state and county government, including public education, is largely provided through ad valorem taxation. It is, therefore, important that our Court require strict compliance with our constitutional and statutory taxation scheme.
The Constitution of the State of Oklahoma tells us what can be taxed and what cannot be taxed. In my opinion the majority opinion has carved out an unauthorized exemption for a favored class. The following legal precepts compel me to dissent from the majority opinion:(1) A leasehold for a term of years is an estate in real property. Title 60 O.S.1981 §…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moeller v. GormleyWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Iron County v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Home-Stake Production Co. v. Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Central Coal & Lumber Co. v. Board of Equalization of Le Flore CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.