Legal Opinion

DiIenno v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 5, 1981No. Appeal, No. 240 C.D. 1980PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

•The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) dismissed the appeal of Humbert G. Dilenno (Dilenno), who was denied benefits by a referee, because it was untimely filed under the provi*498sions of Section 502 of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law).1 We affirm.

There is no dispute that the 15-day limitation of the Law for the perfection of appeals had run at the time this appeal was filed.2 Dilenno, however, contends that he must be permitted to appeal nunc pro tunc since the delay in perfecting his appeal was due to the referee’s failure to adequately inform him…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DERRY TOWNSHIPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Walker v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Das v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Mogil v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Darroch v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Hollis v. TannerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Thomas v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. A. Nason v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. F. Brown v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API