Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Damiano v. Archibald

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 15, 1934No. 3659PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

For the reasons stated by the District Judge in his opinion reported in 5 F. Supp. 297, the order appealed from will be affirmed. The recent decision of the Supreme Court in Hamburg-American Line v. United States, 54 S. Ct. 491, 78 L. Ed. 887, does not touch the question here involved. It was there said that, where a returning alien has the permit prescribed by section 10 of the Immigration Act of 1924 (8 USCA § 210), no fine can be imposed under section 16 of the act (8 USCA § 216) upon the transportation company bringing him in. The case contains no intimation that the alien is not subject…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hamburg-American Line v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United States ex rel. Damiano v. ArchibaldDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. International Game Technology, Inc. v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  2. International Game Technology, Inc. v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API