Legal Opinion

Pinegar v. Webster

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 23, 1937No. 33,084PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

The question involved in the appeal in this foreclosure case is whether or not the answer of the defendants contained inconsistent defenses to the suit on the note and mortgage alleged to have been signed by them.

The answer first contains a general denial-of each and every allegation, statement and averment contained in plaintiff’s petition, except as hereinafter admitted. The third and fourth paragraphs of the answer are as follows:

“Answering defendant denies that he, at any time, executed or delivered the promissory note and/or the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wiley v. KeokukSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  2. Butler v. KaulbackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  3. Fetzer & Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. Wright v. BachellerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  5. Leavenworth Light & Heating Co. v. WallerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Giltner v. StephensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. Phillips v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  3. Giltner v. StephensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  4. Drewicki v. Fidelity & Guaranty Fire Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API