Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 15, 1873PublishedCited by 7 opinions

This was an action of general assumpsit, commenced on the 2d day of August, 1871. The case was referred, and the referee reported the following facts : The defendant invested from ten to twelve thousand dollars in timber lauds, and in the erection of a house, barn, mills and machinery thereon, about two miles and a half from the county road, down the Deerfield River, in Stratton, relying upon the assurances of leading men of the town that a public highway should be laid…

Read the full summary

This was an action of general assumpsit, commenced on the 2d day of August, 1871. The case was referred, and the referee reported the following facts : The defendant invested from ten to twelve thousand dollars in timber lauds, and in the erection of a house, barn, mills and machinery thereon, about two miles and a half from the county road, down the Deerfield River, in Stratton, relying upon the assurances of leading men of the town that a public highway should be laid thereto. The town subsequently voted to build said highway, and on the 20th of October, 1868, the defendant contracted with…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of tho court was delivered by

Peck, J.

Tho objection interposed by the defendant’s counsel, that the action should have boon covenant instead of assumpsit, cannot prevail. Tho contract was not performed on the part of the plaintiff within the time specified in the sealed instrument for such performance. Whore the time for the performance of a contract on tho part of the plaintiff, specified in a sealed instrument, is enlarged by the parties by parol agreement, tho form of remedy is assumpsit, and not covenant or other action counting upon the contract as under seal. The referee…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Huyler's v. Ritz-Carlton Restaurant & Hotel Co. of Atlantic CityDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1924
  2. Douglass & Varnum v. Village of MorrisvilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  3. Lowell v. Wheeler's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
  4. Lehman, Durr & Co. v. PritchettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  5. First Congregational Meeting House Society v. Town of RochesterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API