Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barnett v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1971No. 12264Published

1DissentCrockett, Justice

It is appreciated that this case is not without difficulty. Nevertheless, I believe that there was a sufficient foundation in the evidence to justify submitting the matter to the jury on the basis of the instruction, which is fairly and properly set forth in the next to the last paragraph of the main opinion.1 It will be seen therefrom that the trial court carefully set forth the prerequisites to finding responsibility upon the defendant. Inasmuch as both parties have had a full and fair opportunity to present their evidence and their contentions, and the jury has so found the facts, and the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jacob v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Hales v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Seavey Ex Rel. Ellis v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Loftis v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Robinson v. HreinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API