Legal Opinion

Laban v. Yu Weh Loo Pah Ki Community

Hopi Appellate Court

Decided November 21, 2003No. 03AP000007Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

OPENING STATEMENT

This opinion addresses whether the trial court erroneously denied Appellants’ request for a jury instruction, violated the Appellants’ confrontation clause rights, and exhibited judicial bias against the Appellants. We find in the negative on all three issues and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellants, Joseph Laban and Brian Laban (herein referred to as “Appellants”), were former employees of the Yu Weh Loo Pah Ki (“YWLPK”) Community. They were terminated for cause from employment in September 2001. Appellee is the YWLPK…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. John R. Ulrich, Jr., M.D. v. City and County of San Francisco Laguna Honda Hospital Maria v. Rivero, M.D. Theresa Berta, M.D. Melissa Welch, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Remo Benigni, Dba the Silver Fox v. City of Hemet Roger Miller Jesse Pease Scott JerniganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Curtis v. Oklahoma City Public Schools Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API