Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Aarsvold

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 12, 1985No. C1-85-1063Published

1DissentParker, Judge

In adopting an absolute rule that sale of a controlled substance cannot be an appropriate felony upon which to predicate a charge of felony murder, the majority opinion ignores the facts offered to be proved in this case, and misreads the language and intent of our felony murder statute. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.

While no transcript of the proceedings below has been prepared,- at oral argument before this court the state declared that it had made an offer of proof to the trial court that this particular sale of cocaine was made with knowledge that the deceased intended to take the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. BackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. BowdenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. State v. ForsmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Kochevar v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API