Legal Opinion

Otto v. Dakota Arms, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 16, 2006No. 04-35941Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Appellants Ron Otto, Aaron Pursley and Little Sharps Rifle Manufacturing, LLP (collectively “Sharps”) appeal the district court’s grant of appellee Dakota Arms, Inc.’s (“Dakota”) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The facts and procedural history are known to the parties and we do not recount them here.

First, Montana lacked general jurisdiction over Dakota because Sharps did not establish that Dakota’s contacts with Montana were substantial or continuous and systematic. See Threlkeld v. Colorado, 303 Mont. 432, 16 P.3d 359, 361 (2000). Dakota’s contacts with…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cimmaron Corp. v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Bi-Lo Foods, Inc. v. Alpine Bank, CliftonMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Threlkeld v. ColoradoMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Edsall Const. Co., Inc. v. RobinsonMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Bird v. HillerMontana Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API