Legal Opinion

Graham v. City of Spokane

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1898No. 2897PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County. — Hon. ¥m. E. Richardson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, J.

It is conceded in this case that there are outstanding warrants of the city of Spokane, which were drawn at various times on the different funds of the city, aggregating, with interest, the sum of $300,000, and that the city council, having determined to issue bonds for these outstanding warrants in the manner provided by law, duly passed an ordinance authorizing the sinking-fund commission of the city to enter into a contract with the firm of Morris & Whitehead, bankers, wherein and whereby the city was to agree to deliver the bonds to said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Barton v. HopkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Mullen v. SackettWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Kelley v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Rands v. County of ClarkeWashington Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Overall v. City of MadisonvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  2. County of Los Angeles v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Town of Camden v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Seymour v. City of EllensburgWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. State Capitol Commission v. State Board of FinanceWashington Supreme Court · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API