Woodman v. Blue Grass Land Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $15,-000 for alleged false and fraudulent representations upon the part of defendants whereby plaintiff was led to enter into a contract to purchase certain land, to his injury. A motion to dismiss as to all defendants save Blue Grass Land Company was granted. The case was tried before Simpson, J., who directed .a verdict in favor of defendant company.
Read the full summary
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $15,-000 for alleged false and fraudulent representations upon the part of defendants whereby plaintiff was led to enter into a contract to purchase certain land, to his injury. A motion to dismiss as to all defendants save Blue Grass Land Company was granted. The case was tried before Simpson, J., who directed .a verdict in favor of defendant company. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.
The complaint of plaintiff and appellant sets forth allegations of damage by fraudulent representations made by defendants and respondents to the plaintiff, inducing him to enter into the contract and concerning the title to certain lands situated in Wisconsin, in reliance on which plaintiff was induced to contract to purchase the same and to act in reference to the title, to his damage. Upon trial the action was dismissed as to all the defendants except the Blue Grass Land Company. Testimony was introduced relative to the recovery of damages. It does not appear what that testimony was, nor…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Woodman v. Blue Grass Land Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. PehrsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Stanley McDonald Norman R. Hagfors and Clayton Jensen v. Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Katzenmeier v. DoerenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Woodman v. Blue Grass Band Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907