Legal Opinion
Jock v. STERLING JEWELERS, INC.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 28, 2009No. 08 Civ. 2875(JSR)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, current and former female employees of defendant Sterling Jewelers, Inc. (“Sterling”), a nationwide specialty jeweler, brought this class action alleging that Sterling discriminated against them in pay and promotion on the basis of their gender, in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d). By summary Order dated June 18, 2008, the Court granted plaintiffs’ motion to refer the dispute to arbitration and to stay the instant litigation pending conclusion of that arbitration. In a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the InteriorSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Reno v. Catholic Social Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jock v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Jock v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Jock v. Sterling Jewelers Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Jock v. Sterling Jewelers Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Jock v. Sterling Jewelers Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011