Legal Opinion

Brucato v. Ezenia! Inc.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided December 29, 2004No. 1:04CV691PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

In this diversity contract dispute, plaintiff sues his former employer to recover sales commissions on three sales completed during his employment tenure with defendant. At issue on summary judgment is whether an accord and satisfaction occurs where, as here, the employer treated each of plaintiffs claims separately, explicitly offering nothing on two disputed claims, while offering a 1%, rather than 4%, commission payment as to a third disputed claim. For the reasons that follow, no accord and satisfaction occurred with respect to the claims for which…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Nassoiy v. . TomlinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Fire Ins. Assn., Ltd. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. Transurban USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
  2. Middleburg Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. v. McNeil & Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
  3. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. RIVERO DIAGNOSTIC CENTER, INC., A/A/O CARLOS BACALLAODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API