Legal Opinion

McGuffie v. Hooper

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 22, 1922PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeasy, J.

This is an action to recover damages for alienation of affections. The verdict was for the plaintiff. The defendant moves for a new trial on general grounds and because of the alleged misconduct of a juror.

*119Misconduct of Juror.

The plaintiff’s wife was a witness for the defendant. It appears that during a recess, before her testimony was given, one of the jurors hearing the case, seeing her in tears, said in the hearing of certain others of the defendant’s witnesses, “She is putting it on for effect.”

Assuming that this is such misconduct as would otherwise warrant it, a new trial on this ground…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Polk v. HaworthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Kinneberg v. KinnebergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Grantz v. City of DeadwoodSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Clack v. Kansas City Electrical Wire Subway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Randolph County v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  2. State v. MimmovichSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  3. Carrigan v. Western Radio Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Deschaine v. DeschaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
  5. Harlow v. HarlowSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API