Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Monroe County Child Support Collection Unit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 1, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*945Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Andrew V. Siracuse, J.), entered August 12, 2003. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted respondent Monroe County Child Support Collection Unit third priority on the proceeds of a settlement obtained by petitioner.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly determined that petitioner’s attorneys have first priority to the proceeds of a settlement obtained by petitioner in connection with a work-related injury followed by,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Indosuez v. Sopwith Holdings Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Daniels v. Monroe County Child Support Collection UnitNew York Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Kitson & Kitson v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. 18th Judicial District of the District Attorney Family Support DivisionColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Piccarreto v. MuraNew York Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API