State v. Tourtillot
Oregon Supreme Court
1DissentLinde, J.
In order to sustain the conviction in this case, the court is prepared to decide that an Oregon state police officer may stop motorists at a temporary "checkpoint” set up at his own discretion in order to investigate whether they perhaps have committed a criminal offense, without either probable cause or grounds for suspicion that any occupant of the vehicle has done so. This result is rationalized by a faulty analysis of the governing constitutional law and, in consequence, of Oregon law. The rationalization has farreaching implications which will set the courts, and thus those who must…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.