Legal Opinion

McMillan v. Beebe

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 14, 1936No. 1 Div. 919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

The bill seeks to have a deed declared a mortgage, but unaccompanied by any offer of redemption. On the contrary, the bill discloses complainant’s inability to pay the debt, and his testimony is to like effect.

Complainant has proceeded upon the theory that the court will assum'e jurisdiction merely for the purpose of declaring the deed a mortgage. Though there are authorities sustaining this view (41 Corpus Juris 364, note 37), yet . a. different rule has long been established in this jurisdiction (Micou v. Ashurst, 55 Ala. 607; Bone v. Lansden, 85 Ala. 562, 6 So. 611).

Based…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Micou v. AshurstSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. Bone v. LansdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. J. H. Morris, Inc. v. Indian Hills, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. Edmondson v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API