Legal Opinion

Horeczko v. State Board of Registration

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 31, 1991No. B049131PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

—George Horeczko (appellant) appeals from a judgment of the superior court which denied his petition for a writ of administrative mandamus directing the State Board of Registration for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors (the Board) to approve his application for permission to use the title “geotechnical (soils) engineer.” We have examined the statutory scheme under which his application was submitted and we find it does not suffer from the constitutional infirmities which appellant contends are present in that scheme. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Procedural…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Blumenthal v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Ex Parte WhitleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Naismith Dental Corp. v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schabarum v. California LegislatureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Rich v. SchwabCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Rich v. SchwabCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Schabarum v. California LegislatureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Opinion No. (1998), California Attorney General Reports1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API