Legal Opinion

Triangle Corp. v. United States

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 27, 1984No. Civ. H-83-1059 (PCD)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

DORSEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Triangle Corporation (Triangle), sued to recover interest alleged to be due on a tax refund, pursuant to Section 6611 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (Title 26, United States Code). Defendant has moved to dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is denied.

For the purposes of a motion to dismiss, the allegations of the complaint must be construed in the light most favorable to plaintiff. Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236-37, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1686, 40 L.Ed.2d…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Murphy v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
  5. Citadel Industries, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sunoco, Inc. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2004
  2. Harriman v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
  3. Schortmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. Trustees of Bulkeley School v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1986
  5. Doolin v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API