Legal Opinion

State v. Muhammad

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 2011No. ED 94323PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Judge.

The defendant, Mikal Muhammad, alleges the trial court plainly erred when it instructed the jury as to the offense of felonious restraint, rather than the offense of false imprisonment with which he was charged. We affirm the convictions for false imprisonment because the jury necessarily found all elements of false imprisonment when it concluded the defendant was guilty of the greater offense of felonious restraint. But we reverse the judgment’s designation of the false-imprisonment counts as class D felonies and remand the cause with instructions to designate these…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  2. State v. IrbyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. GantMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. State v. CobbinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. ShipleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. FloydMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. State v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State of Missouri v. Jerrill A. GreenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API