Legal Opinion

Irace v. Kramer

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.

By this proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act petitioner, the owner of a triangular parcel of land at Albertson, seeks a review of a determination of the *433Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of North Hempstead which refused his application for a variance.

The area of the plot is about 4,500 square feet. The ordinance required 5,000 square feet, and imposed certain setback requirements with which petitioner could not comply. The application was rejected on the theory that the petitioner’s title was acquired through the county as the result of a tax sale and that the county, while…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cambareri v. MichaelisNew York Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Klevan v. VolzNew York Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API