Legal Opinion

Barrow v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 3, 1915No. 5756PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Burglary; from Tattnall superior court—Judge Sheppard. April 15, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtBussell, C. J.

The ruling stated in the headnote determines the only serious question in the case. Apparently there was no error in the refusal to grant a new trial upon the alleged newly discovered evidence, but we forbear to express any opinion as to this, because upon the new trial which, for the reason stated in the headnote, we feel constrained to grant, the accused will have the opportunity of submitting that testimony to the jury.

The evidence in the record fully warranted the verdict of guilty, but the werdict can not be held to have been demanded; and for that reason, since a grave irregularity must…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BoggsWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Good v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Good v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Mayor of Savannah v. KicklighterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API