LeClerc v. Gray
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.
The principal issue to be decided is the propriety of the action of the trial court granting plaintiff LeClerc’s motion to set aside a jury verdict for the defendant, Virginia, and ordering a new trial on liability and damages.
LeClerc’s action was for personal injuries suffered on March 24, 1967, in Rochester from a collision between the car he was operating and one driven by Virginia. The jury first returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $1639.35 which was the amount of his medical bills submitted as an exhibit. The Trial Court (Loughlin, J.) upon receipt of the verdict set it…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wisutskie v. MalouinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
- Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
- Gomes v. RoySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1954
- Sconsa v. RichmondSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1960
- Whiting v. SussmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1917
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BelknerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Bothwick v. LaBelleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Brigham v. Hudson Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Bunnell v. LucasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985