Legal Opinion

Sexton v. Clayton County Tax Digest

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 31, 2000No. A00A0379PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eldridge, Judge.

The issue presented for determination comes under OCGA § 48-5-310, i.e., when temporary ad valorem taxes are ordered collected by a superior court because the county tax digest has not been approved by the State Revenue Commissioner, should the trial court use a millage rate that will produce revenue exceeding the adopted budget *432when applied to the unapproved tax digest that is approximately $493,000,000 in excess of the 1998 digest. The answer is no, because only the millage rate necessary to satisfy the adopted budget would be lawful; therefore, the millage rate shall be…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rayle Electric Membership Corporation v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Dyer v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. McDowell v. Judges Ex OfficioSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Fine v. Dade CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  5. Todd v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clayton County v. SextonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  2. Sexton v. Clayton County Tax DigestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API