Sparks v. East

There is no dispute as to the facts. The appellant, holding an unsatisfied judgment against .the appellee, caused execution to. be issued thereon, and levied by the garnishment of appellee’s employer, an interurban railway company. The garnishee answered that it was indebted to ;the appellee. Thereupon, the appellee appeared, and moved to discharge the garnishment, on the ground that he was the resident head of a family, and that the debt due him from the garnishee was wages for his personal services, during the preceding two weeks, prior to the garnishment, and was, therefore, exempt from…