Legal Opinion

Kitay v. Halpern

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1931No. Appeal 137PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldbige, J.,

The plaintiff recovered a verdict of $2,500 as dam ages for injuries sustained as a result of the defendant striking him with his fist on the nose. The defendant admits striking the plaintiff, but he contends the plaintiff was the aggressor and struck him the first blow and that he was acting in self defense.

The appellant argues that the charge of the court was inaccurate as to the duty of the defendant to retreat, if the plaintiff was the aggressor. The trial judge laid down correct principles of law respecting the duty, in certain circumstances, of one who is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SzachewiczSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Commonwealth v. WareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  3. Logue v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
  4. Morrow-Smith Co. v. Cleveland Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Cook v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Williams ex rel. Williams v. PapiDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. PresognaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Link v. Mauz (In re Mauz)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Ferguson v. Electric Factory Concerts, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2009
  5. Bisbee Linseed Co. v. Phœnix Paint & Varnish Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API