Legal Opinion

Wilder v. Loehr

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 16, 1924No. 6 Div. 145, 146PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

One Peter Zinszer died in the city of Birmingham in 1895, leaving surviving him his widow Rosa Zinszer (now Rosa Wilder), one of the appellants here, and his son Joseph who at the time was 17 years of age. At the time of his death Peter Zin-szer was the owner of a large mercantile establishment in Birmingham, and also owned some valuable real estate, a portion of which is involved in this litigation.

On November 12, 1887, said Peter Zinszer made a will. Under the terms of this will his said widow now claims to own the property involved in this litigation, and files this bill to settle the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. BuffumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  2. Kendall v. ClappMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  3. Parks v. KimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Mixter v. WoodcockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  5. Keith v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Roberts v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. Frye v. Community ChestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. Nan W. Robertson, as of the Estate of James S. Robertson, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  4. Ide v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  5. Festorazzi v. First National Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API