Legal Opinion
Tate v. Woman's Hospital Foundation
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided January 19, 2011No. 2010-C-0425PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAME.*
_JjAt issue in this case is whether the court of appeal erred in finding there are genuine issues of material fact precluding summary judgment on plaintiffs invasion of privacy claim. For the reasons that follow, we conclude defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and therefore reverse the judgment of the court of appeal.
UNDERLYING FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff, Frank Tate, was employed by defendant, Woman’s Hospital Foundation d/b/a Woman’s Hospital, in its maintenance department. In 2006, one of plaintiffs coworkers reported to a supervisor that someone…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Southern Development Co. v. GrecoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
- Shelton v. Standard/700 AssociatesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- Jaubert v. Crowley Post-Signal, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Pack v. WiseLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Cellular One, Inc. v. BoydLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Doe v. Southern Gyms, LLCSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
- Ames v. OhleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Bradix v. Advance Stores Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Brunner v. HollowayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Juge v. Springfield Wellness, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.