Legal Opinion

Claim of Pietrocola v. Colony Liquor Distributors, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeals from a decision and an amended decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed September 15, 1989 and September 19, 1990, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant’s case had been improperly closed.

Whether a case has been "closed” for purposes of Workers’ Compensation Law § 25-a is a question of fact (see, Matter of Scalesse v Printing Adv. Corp., 30 NY2d 234, 237). The record here discloses that the case was first reopened within seven years of the date of the accident; thus the employer’s workers’ compensation insurance carrier continued to be responsible at that point for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of Scalesse v. Printing Advertising Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Claim of Gyory v. Fairchild Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claim of Rathbun v. D'Ella Pontiac Buick GMC, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Claim of Knapp v. Empire Aluminum IndustriesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API