Legal Opinion

United States v. Warner

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 13, 2003No. 02 CR 506PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PALLMEYER, District Judge.

Defendant Lawrence Warner has been charged in a 10-count superseding indictment with extortion under the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1346, money laundering, 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(B)®, racketeering under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(c), and aiding and abetting public officials and employees in the commission of these crimes, 18 U.S.C. § 2. He now asks the court to strike or dismiss Count I, Racketeering Acts 1-7 and 9-12, and Counts II, III, IV, V, VIII,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. O'HaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Hammerschmidt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. RingDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  2. Ryan v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  3. United States v. VrdolyakDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
  4. United States v. TroutmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API