Legal Opinion

Florsheim v. Schilling

United States Circuit Court

Decided January 11, 1886PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtBlodgett, J.

The complainants, by this bill, seek an injunction and accounting for the alleged infringement by defendant of patent No. 238,100, granted by the United States to Simon Florsheim and Thomas H. Ball, February 22, 1881, for a “corset;” and letters patent No. 238,101, granted to the same parties, on the same date, for an “elastic gore or gusset for wearing apparel;” the invention in both patents appearing to have been made by the complainant Florsheim, and the patent issued to himself and Ball.

No. 238,100 is for a corset constructed with an elastic section extending from the top to the bottom,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. Hicks v. KelseySupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Alvord v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cutler-Hammer Mfg. Co. v. Union Electric Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API