Legal Opinion

Kulkov v. Botvinik

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1998No. A97A2376PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Judge.

Alexander Kulkov appeals the trial court’s order striking his answer and counterclaim and awarding judgment to Semen Botvinik. The underlying action arose when Botvinik sued his son, Kulkov, for money owed based on a promise to pay, fraud, deception, and theft. After the trial court found Kulkov in wilful violation of its previous discovery order, it struck Kulkov’s answer and counterclaim. The trial court then awarded damages and attorney fees to Botvinik.

1. In several enumerations of error, Kulkov contends that the trial court erred in its decision regarding his discovery…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hosseini v. DoninoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Plumides v. American Engines & Transmissions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Trevino v. FlandersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  2. Schacknow v. WoodringCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API