Legal Opinion

Corel v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided June 15, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On Plea to Jurisdiction.

1Opinion of the Court

PHILIPS, District Judge.

The plaintiff has interposed a plea to the jurisdiction of the court, on the ground that at the time of the institution of the suit in the state court, and the time of its removal therefrom by the defendant to this court, the plaintiff was a citizen of Oklahoma territory, and, the defendant being a nonresident corporation of the state of Missouri, this court has no jurisdiction over the parties.

The evidence shows that the plaintiff, an unmarried man, for many years prior to July 18, 1901, was a citizen of the state of Missouri. He was a practicing dentist at Kansas…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Wolfe v. Hartford Life & Annuity InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Alabama G. S. R. v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1898
  4. Rucker v. BollesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
  5. Winn v. GilmerUnited States Circuit Court · 1886

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sathre v. MoodieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Harding v. Standard Oil Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1910
  3. Peeples v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  4. Delgado v. LatimerDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1920
  5. Peeples v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API