Legal Opinion

Adamson v. Port of Bellingham

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 14, 2019No. 16-35314Published

1Per curiam

We certified two questions to the Washington State Supreme Court. Adamson v. Port of Bellingham , 899 F.3d 1047 (9th Cir. 2018). We said that if "the Washington State Supreme Court decides that a priority usage agreement does not absolve a landlord of liability as a possessor of property, we will affirm the district court." Id. at 1051.

The Washington State Supreme Court so decided. "The fact that AMHS was in berth and using the passenger ramp at the time of the incident does not affect the Port's liability as a landowner-lessor. We answer the first certified question in the affirmative."…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Adamson v. Port of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Shannon Adamson v. Port of BellinghamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API