Legal Opinion

Oraa v. McKennell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 10, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), dated March 17, 1998, as granted the motion of the defendant Brian McKennell, d/b/a Custom Visions, for summary judgment, to the extent of dismissing the plaintiffs’ causes of action based upon Labor Law §§ 200, 240 (1) and § 241 (6), granted the motion of the defendants Terri Kiel and David J. Kiel for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and denied their cross motion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whelen v. Warwick Valley Civic & Social ClubNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Yearke v. ZarconeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Howerter v. DuganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McNulty v. Executive Kitchens, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Mattes v. JosephAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Decker v. BaroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API