State v. Paul
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal frora Circuit Court, Davison county. Hon. Frank B. Smith, Judge. The defendant, Joseph Paul, was convicted! of obtaining property under false pretenses, and1 he appeals. Affirmed.
Read the full summary
Appeal frora Circuit Court, Davison county. Hon. Frank B. Smith, Judge. The defendant, Joseph Paul, was convicted! of obtaining property under false pretenses, and1 he appeals. Affirmed. (i) To point one of the .opinion, Appellant cited-: 'People vs. Tomlinson,'35 Cal. 503; State vs. Butcher, 1 S. D. 401, 47 N'. W. 406; State vs. Burchard1, 4 S- D. 57 N. W. 491. Respondent cited: Laws 1913, €h. 242; 19 Cye. 393; Peo. vs. Hines (Cal.) 89 Pac. 858. (3) To point three, Appellant cited: Pen. Cod'e, 'Sec. 605. Respondent recited: 11 Ruling Case Law, 828; State vs. Buck, 186 'Mo. 15, 84 S. W. 9511,…
1Opinion of the CourtMeCOY, J.
Appellant was convicted of the'criminal offense of obtaining property under false pretenses,' 'and brings the cause before this court on appeal. After, .conviction the appellant made motion in arrest of1 judgment on the ground that the information does not describe or state a public offense. The information in substance alleged' that Joseph Paul, .the appellant, on the 25th day of October, 1917, in the county of Davison and state of South Dakota, did willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously, wiith intent to cheat and defraud one Miller, obtain from one Stahl, at the request of Miller, the said…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. HalidaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. ProvostSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. LangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. WoodSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
- Hallam v. Commerce Mining & Royalty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- State v. FriasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.