Legal Opinion

Deadra Combs v. City of Huntington, Texas

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 15, 2016No. 15-40436PublishedCited by 158 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge:

Plaintiff-Appellant Deadra Combs brought a Title VII sexual harassment suit against the City of Huntington (the “City”), asserting hostile work environment, quid pro quo, and retaliation claims. Combs succeeded only on her hostile work environment claim and was awarded a fraction of the damages she sought. Combs then moved for attorney’s fees. After calculating the lodestar, the district court reduced the fee award, concluding that the ratio between attorney’s fees and damages was excessively disproportionate. Combs appeals, contending that the district court…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by158 opinions

  1. Loftin v. City of Prentiss, MSCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
  2. Miraglia v. Bd. of Supervisors of the La. State MuseumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  3. JohnJay Portillo v. Gregory CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  4. Krystal Gurule v. Land Guardian, IncorporatCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  5. Moench v. Marquette Transportation Co. Gulf-Inland, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016

153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API