Helvering v. Nibley-Mimnaugh Lumber Co.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GRONER, Associate Justice.
Respondent was a corporation organized under the laws of Oregon and engaged in the lumber business. Some time prior to August 1, 1923, it had negotiated with Bowman-Hicks Lumber Company for the purpose of effecting a sale of its plant, timber lands, and personal property. On the date mentioned, respondent’s board of directors, with the approval of more than two-thirds of its stockholders, passed a resolution authorizing its president and secretary to convey title to all of its assets to J. P. Ravenscroft as liquidating trustee, but this conveyance was never actually…
2Cited by26 opinions
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Union Pac. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. SegallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- Floyd R. Clodfelter and Enna L. Clodfelter v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Campbell (United States, Intervenor) (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Keneipp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.