Legal Opinion
Frank Paul Riley v. E. P. Perini, Superintendent, Marion Correctional Institution
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 27, 1970No. 19637_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
and ORDER.
Petitioner applied for a writ of habeas corpus in the District Court claiming that the Ohio Adult Parole Authority, in denying parole to him, took into account his criminal record.
The District Judge, in considering the habeas corpus application, interpreted our decision in Rose v. Haskins, 388 F.2d 91 (6th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 392 U.S. 946, 88 S.Ct. 2300, 20 L.Ed.2d 1408, as conferring authority upon him to review the action of the Ohio Adult Parole Authority to determine whether, in denying parole to the prisoner, the Authority abused its discretion. In our opinion, Rose is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Herbert E. Rose v. E. B. Haskins, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Arlie Jones v. William D. Salisbury, Superintendent, Chillicothe Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Rose v. HaskinsOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- Clyde Dixon Hinkle v. Ohio Parole AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Edward Morgan MacKenna v. Harry S. Avery, Commissioner of Correction and Chairman of Board of Pardons and ParolesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
3Cited by7 opinions
- Robert J. Scarpa v. U. S. Board of Parole, Walter Dunbar, ChairmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- J. T. Roach v. Board of Pardons and Paroles, State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Joyce v. GilliganDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1974
- Ridenour v. CollinsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
- Robert J. Scarpa v. U. S. Board of Parole, Walter Dunbar, ChairmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.