Shute v. Shute
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Aedrich, J., Lancaster, Action by Howell H. Shute against William H. Shute, John Shute and Joseph D. Shute. From Circuit order overruling deimlurrer to complaint and referring issues-, defendant, Joseph D. Shute, appeals. cites: Cloud must be apparently valid: 38 S. C., 268; 27 N. J. Eq., 568; 85 N. C., 329; 86 N. Y., 232; 44 Cal., 29; 40 N. Y., 547; 5 Minn., 95; 13 Wis., 641; 10 N. Y., 549; 71 Me., 235; 103 Ill., 410; 45 Si.
Read the full summary
Before Aedrich, J., Lancaster, Action by Howell H. Shute against William H. Shute, John Shute and Joseph D. Shute. From Circuit order overruling deimlurrer to complaint and referring issues-, defendant, Joseph D. Shute, appeals. cites: Cloud must be apparently valid: 38 S. C., 268; 27 N. J. Eq., 568; 85 N. C., 329; 86 N. Y., 232; 44 Cal., 29; 40 N. Y., 547; 5 Minn., 95; 13 Wis., 641; 10 N. Y., 549; 71 Me., 235; 103 Ill., 410; 45 Si. C., 602. Possession is necessary: 76 S. C., 517; 121 U. S., 566; 17 Ency. P. & P., 306; 45 Am. St. R., 373; Pom. Eq. Jur., sec. 1399; 17 Ency. P. & P., 343, 159,…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chief Justice Pope.
Howell PI. Shute brought his action against William H. Shute, John Shute and Joseph D. Shute, alleging that he was seized in fee of a tract of land containing three hundred and thirty-seven acres, fully described in the complaint hereinafter reproduced, but that on the 6th day of August, 1892, he, without being paid any consideration whatever, signed a paper purporting to be a deed for the said tract of land to his three sons, William H. Shute, John Shute and Joseph D. Shute, but never delivered the same and the same has never…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McLaurin v. HodgesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
- Farmers' Mutual Ins. Ass'n of Edgefield v. BerrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
- Ex parte ApelerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
- Hughes v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
- Gregory v. PerrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- The Mobley Co. v. McLucasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
- Vereen Ex Rel. Vereen v. BellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
- Sloan v. BurnettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929