Legal Opinion

Direct Energy Marketing Ltd. v. Duke/Louis Dreyfus, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 28, 2002No. Docket No. 01-7834PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part.

Plaintiffs Direct Energy Marketing Limited (“DEML”), a Canadian corporation, and its former shareholders, John Lagadin and 646885 Alberta Ltd., brought this suit in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Eginton, /.) against defendants Duke/Louis Dreyfus LLC (“D/LD”), Duke Energy Corporation, Louis Dreyfus Energy Corp. and Does 1-50, asserting liability growing out of the failure of Duke/Louis…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Japan Petroleum Co.(Nigeria) Ltd. v. Ashland OilDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1978
  2. Royal Industries Ltd. v. Kraft Foods, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  3. Campbell v. Triangle Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coastal Communications Service, Inc. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
  2. Omega Demolition Corp. v. Hays Group, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
  3. Direct Energy Marketing Ltd. v. Duke/Louis Dreyfus, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  4. Lane v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API