Disotell v. Henry Luther Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Green Lake county: Geo. "W. Bubhell, Circuit Judge. The defendant is a corporation engaged in the manufacture of zinc washboards. The plaintiff is an infant of eighteen years, who received a personal injury while employed by the defendant in its factory.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Green Lake county: Geo. "W. Bubhell, Circuit Judge. The defendant is a corporation engaged in the manufacture of zinc washboards. The plaintiff is an infant of eighteen years, who received a personal injury while employed by the defendant in its factory. The plaintiff in his complaint claims, and there is evidence tending to show, that the plaintiff’s business was the feeding of a machine called the “ crimping machine; ” that this machine consists of two metallic rollers, revolving horizontally close together, about three feet above the floor,…
1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.
The record contains no certificate of the trial judge that the bill of exceptions contains all the tesr *637timony given, upon the trial. In the absence of such certificate, the presumption is that every fact within the issue and essential to support the judgment was proved upon the trial. Lee v. Campbell, 77 Wis. 340. So there can be no review of the case upon the testimony here, nor any inference inconsistent with the verdict drawn. Morrow v. Lander, 77 Wis. 77. Sufficient of the testimony is preserved in the bill of -exceptions to show that there was testimony tending to prove all the facts…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Washburn v. Milwaukee & Lake Winnebago RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Hermann v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
- Morrow v. LanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Lee v. CampbellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by4 opinions
- Solberg v. Robbins Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Bolton v. OvittSupreme Court of Vermont · 1907
- Butler v. GillisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Conatty v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898