TENSLEY v. State

WHATLEY, Judge.

Warren Tensley challenges the order summarily denying his motion for postcon-viction relief. We affirm without comment the postconviction court’s denial of Tens-ley’s motion in all respects except one.

In his memorandum of law in support of his amended motion for postconviction relief, Tensley argued that the record does not reveal a tactical reason for defense counsel to have allowed trial to occur after the 175-day speedy trial period expired. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.191(a). However, he failed to allege prejudice from trial counsel’s conduct by alleging “ ‘that the State could…