Legal Opinion

In re Diallo H.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 25, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: There is insufficient evidence to sustain the adjudication that respondent is a person in need of supervision (Matter of David N., 92 AD2d 739; Matter of Freeman B., 93 AD2d 997). Neither petitioner (respondent’s foster mother) nor the respondent testified. The only evidence concerning respondent’s conduct was a partial admission from the Law Guardian that respondent has been guilty of curfew violations. This “admission” from one who has no personal knowledge of the facts cannot serve as legally competent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re David N.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. In re Freeman B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Shari WW.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. In re Duane D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API