Legal Opinion

Pruneau v. Sanders

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 7, 1975No. 7510DC65PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the following conclusion of law:

“That the amounts currently being paid to the plaintiff under a separation agreement executed by the parties are, by the wording of the agreement and by treatment of the parties, alimony payments and the plaintiff is not obliged as such to apply the same to the support of the minor children. Conversely, the defendant cannot contract away his obligation to support his minor children, and, to the extent the agreement seeks to foreclose the courts from consideration of child support, it is unenforceable.”

We think the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lane v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Jones v. Palace Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Rothman v. RothmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Paschall v. PaschallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Greer v. GreerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Falls v. FallsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Glesner v. DembroskyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. King v. DemoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Best v. BestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Rustad v. RustadCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API