Legal Opinion

Deville v. Defending Attorneys for Continental Oil Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 11, 1984No. 83-603PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULPEPPER, Judge Pro Tern.

Elton Deville, plaintiff, brought this defamation action seeking damages for injury to his reputation and business as a result of the appearance of an alleged defamatory allegation in a trial memorandum prepared by defendants, attorneys at law. The trial memorandum was the product of a previously litigated Federal Court case where the defendants herein represented the parties adverse to the plaintiff, Deville. The trial court held, that as a matter of law, the statement was not defamatory and granted summary judgment in favor of defendants. Plaintiff now appeals. We…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  2. Wattigny v. LambertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Clement v. TaylorLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Darby v. DoucetLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Deville v. Defending Attorneys for Continental Oil Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Spears v. McCormick & Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Autry v. WoodallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API