Legal Opinion

Palo v. Palo

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1980No. 12907PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Justice.

The trial court granted appellee a divorce from appellant and divided the parties’ property. Appellant appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for a continuance of the trial date under the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act (Act). We affirm.

Both parties were, at all times material herein, members of the military service. Appellee commenced an action for divorce while both parties were in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Appellant answered, but before the sixty-day cooling off period * had lapsed, both parties were transferred to Germany.

On July 20, 1979, appellant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boone v. LightnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. State ex rel. Stenstrom v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Tabor v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
  4. Norris v. Superior Court of Mohave CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Tabor v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Catlin v. CatlinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Roberts v. FuhrMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Hackman v. PostelDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  4. Childs v. ChildsAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Wilson v. BUTLER, BY AND THROUGH BUTLERMississippi Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API