Legal Opinion

Hewitt, Ruffner & Co. v. Sturdevant

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 29, 1844PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the Louisville Chancery Court. Partners and partnership property. Chattels.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Ewing

In 1838, Hewitt, Ruffner & Co. and L. G. Sturdevant and John Wilson, agreed to build, and did build and fit out the steamboat Hugh L. White, near the City of Louisville, tobe employed on the western waters, in carrying freight and passengers for profit; Hewitt, Ruffner & Co. *454to be interested one half, Sturdevant one third, and Wilson one sixth. The boat was completed and fitted out, and commenced business about the 1st of January, 1839, under the command and management of Wilson as Captain and master and Sturdevant as clerk. Prior to em tering on business, a settlement was made among the part…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mumford v. NicollCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1822

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lowman v. SheetsIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Hinton v. LawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1847
  3. Loud v. LoringU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1884
  4. Taylor v. U. S. Bldg. & Loan Assn's AssigneeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API